What is the #1 worst place the NHL could possibly put a hockey team?

In terms οf thе hockey market.

ѕοmе candidates inclue: Hawaii, Nеw Mexico, Alabama, Louisiana, Puerto Rico, Tennessee, аnd Oklahoma. Sad business іѕ thеrе′s already a team іn one οf thеѕе places. Thаt sucks.

BQ: whаt places wουld bе GOOD fοr a hockey team.

24 Responses to “What is the #1 worst place the NHL could possibly put a hockey team?”

  • Hook Em` Horns (9-0):

    Arizona as you can tell.
    and i reckon michigan or minnesota would be excellent.

  • Jaguar Jones <3s The Stars:

    space….

    BQ* vegas imo

  • Casey G has CRS disease:

    Mercury would be a terrible place to place a hockey team. it’s too hot there.. oh and it’s in space.

    BQ: somewhere in Canada. (Canada not canadia)

  • Judge:

    the sun. it would be sooo hard to skim on boiling water

    best place would be uranus because its cold

    and amusing

  • Kate:

    Oklahoma. I had enough expirence in that state to know. They ONLY care about football. A hockey team would disrupt their terrible lives and cause a revolution. It would be the largest dissipate of money.

    And then the obvious answers like Hawaii, Puerto Rico, Cuba.

    BQ: Winnipeg, Hartford, Quebec City, Seattle, Portland, Vegas would be excellent too.

  • Jacoby: Tyler Myers=ROY:

    Realistically out of major cities:

    Oklahoma City

    BQ- Seattle

  • Joe B:

    Anchorage, Alaska or Siberia, Iran wouldn’t be the best place either.

    BQ-Green Bay, Wisconsin..Just reckon it could be a excellent market.

    Space would be a GREAT place,imagine the taunting towards the Uranus hockey team?

  • D Hue:

    Kansas City or Las Vegas. The fans in KC wouldn’t care and there would be no fans in Vegas

    BQ: WINNIPEG!!!!

  • cattledog:

    Juarez, Mexico. Drug cartles, random murders on a epic scale and the arena would play Tejano music when someone scores a goal.

    BQ: Juarez, Mexico for the same reasons… it might make a fascinating season with a Mexican team in the league.

  • thelau:

    Really, i don’t reckon Oklahoma would be that terrible. My vote would go to Mobile, Alabama.

  • Jacquot:

    A horrible place to place one would be Phoenix.

    Oh wait…..

    BQ: Winnipeg

  • AJ?crab:

    iraq

    BQ: we could use more hockey everywhere…its just that excellent

  • Kilometers:

    Somewhere in america

  • Mickey:

    Th worst is Antartica, Africa, Asia, Europe and South America
    The best is Wennipeg, Hamilton, and Quebec City

  • Awesome Bill:

    The worst: Winnipeg, Hamilton, Quebec City…..shall I continue?

    BA: Basically, any city located south of the United States/Canada border.

  • Claude B:

    Worst place Reno, Nevada.
    Best places; Quebec and Winnipeg, both in CANADA

  • Kool Shelby:

    Newfoundland

  • Bird Brain:

    Long Island, New York

  • Pierre McGuire:

    I always thought that Alabama would be a terrible place for a hockey team. I also thought that somewhere in Afghanistan would be sweet terrible too.

    A fantastic place for a hockey team would be in Maine (Portland or Augusta)

  • Wii4NHL:

    Worst place? hawaii, alaska or any of the 3 canadian territories.
    BQ: any major city (new york, toronto, ottawa, los angeles, anaheim, orlando, miami, vancouver, calgary, etc.)

  • Go Sens Go!:

    England

    BQ: Windsor, they make up half of Detroit’s attendance it’s about time they got their own franchise.

  • What would you do for a Klondike:

    The Sun….. or The Equator or Death Valley

    Kilometer = Bitc*

  • Blast Penguins and Leafs Rule:

    Phoenix
    Oaklahoma
    Texas
    Nunavut

  • SJSharks:

    Ok, take a look at this: Georgia.
    BQ: Winnipeg, Hartford or Quebec!