If you had to start a hockey team would you choose SIdney Crosby or Olvechkin?

I’m taking Crosby ALL DAY

21 Responses to “If you had to start a hockey team would you choose SIdney Crosby or Olvechkin?”

  • M????i? - ????g? ? ?????:

    Ovie.

  • Kate:

    And I can’t stand people who call Sidney a crybaby. Please name me ONE time you’ve heard him weep, Melanie, please. ‘Cos I’ve been living in Pittsburgh for a long time and I’ve never once heard him whine.

    I’m taking Sidander Crosvechkin!

  • sam i am!:

    ovechkin!!

  • JFri:

    I agree with the nag about Iginla. But out of the two I would take Ovechkin.

  • Jem:

    Crosby of course.

  • fleury292001:

    I would take Crosby first because he is a playmaker ans draws penalties, sweet decent on faceoffs. If I could snag Ovechkin at some later point I would because he has rifle shot.

  • ?????? (FBE):

    Olvechkin?Who’s he?

    I would take neither.I would never start a team with a superstar.I like balenced teams better.If I were to make a team from the players at the moment it would be like this…

    Fowards

    Alexander Frolov – Marc Savard – Jason Pominville
    Antoine Vermette – Matt Cullen – Nikolai Zherdev
    Sean Avery – Bobby Holik – Jarkko Ruutu
    Ryan Hollweg – Gary Roberts – Georges Laraque

    Defensemen

    Brian Rafalski – Marek Zidlicky
    Fedor Tyutin – Anton Volchenkov
    Aaron Ward – Jaroslav Spacek

    Goalies

    Starter – Henrik Lundqvist
    Backup – Ty Conklin

  • paps0130:

    sidney all the way to the stanly cup!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! GO PENS!

  • anaheimducksfan30:

    im taking olveckin. im not taking crybaby

  • rufonz:

    Kate… why would you take what flyers fans are saying about crosby personally? CLEARLY they’re just getting on his case because he’s the cross state rival. Crosby’s accomplishments speak for themselves. They wouldn’t chant “crosby sucks” if they didn’t reckon crosby was a really excellent player, they wouldn’t bother. The guy won the art ross and the hart trophy last year. No one who really understands hockey would say crosby sucks. Its ridiculous. He’s a superstar. The face of the nhl, and I’m not even a penguins fan.

    I’d take crosby, even if ovechkin is the better one on one forward. Crosby is fit to be a captain. His career will have longevity, more than ovechkin. Crosby has a better mentality in terms of winning than ovechkin does. Even if Ovechkin is the better scorer. But if you know hockey, the guy who sees the huge picture is usually the best bet.

  • Erica:

    I’m a Penguins and Crosby fan, so my answer is biased. I’m sure I could write a paragraph or two about why I’d pick Crosby over Ovechkin… but seriously, either one is a excellent choice. You could erect a fantastic team around either one of them, based on his strengths and weaknesses.

  • Kevin:

    I’d take Crosby. Ovechkin has unbelievable ability and can score on a whim, but Crosby makes all the people on his line a threat. Did you see when he banked a goal in off the back of Malkin’s leg against NY? He scores plenty of goals, but he also has the assists. Crosby will score 35-45 and set up 70-80. I’ll take that ratio to a 50-60 with 30-40 assists. Ovechkin would go #2, immediately, but I like Crosby first.

  • Confused:

    Crosby. Ovechkin may be the better goal scorer, but Crosby truly does make his entire line better, and always knows when to pass and when to shoot.

  • puzzledwithexcel:

    It’s fascinating that many on here discuss only the offensive capabilities of both Crosby and Ovechkin…how about their defensive skills, forechecking ability and face-off skill? Crosby is a better defensive player and is over-all more versatile than Ovechkin (although Ovechkin can deliver some tough body checks). I’d take Sidney because of his usefulness.

    How many of you on here have really met and talked with Crosby? I have, and he is generous with his time, and very congenial and down-to-earth. But he is also very honest about his hockey career and is committed to excellence. So if he is seen talking to the refs, does it mean he is “whining” or argumentative about something? Maybe he wants an description or clarification. I’m sure that all those dissing Sidney would change their minds about him if he played on their team and they were able to view his skills on a regular basis.

  • Blues fan1022:

    sidney crosby

  • Sweety Singh:

    There both extremely talented players but I’m vacant to go with Crosby.

  • ? ? go?c???:

    Crolvechkin.

  • mariola b:

    ovechkin. Just because sid cant pull of the things that ovechkin does. plus ovechkin is more of a ” do it yourself” kind of guy and crosby need help from cino and hossa. and the fact that crosby complains about everything. I reckon crosby is to young for the c

  • Hartley Designs:

    I would probably take Crosby, even even if I feel that Ovechkin is currently a better player. I reckon that Crosby will be better for longer in the future.

  • Adriana L:

    ovechkin-he is just as excellent or better than crosby and he doesn’t whine all game and his passion is incredible, seeing him after he scores a goal is fantastic. ovechkin is more physical than crosby too and won’t whine when someone touches him

  • Clara the Jayhawk 16:

    Probably Crosby, but Ovechkin is awesome, too.